Godara, M. & Singer T. (2024)
10-Week Trajectories of Candidate Psychological Processes Differentially Predict Mental Health Gains from Online Dyadic Versus Mindfulness Interventions: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(11), 3295.
Matthaeus, H., Godara, M., Silveira, S., Hecht, M., Voelkle, M., & Singer, T. (2024).
Loneliness through the Power of Practicing Together: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Online Dyadic Socio-Emotional vs. Mindfulness-Based Training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(5), 570.
Offene Stellen Edu:Social School Projekt
Zur Unterstützung für unser Edu:Social School Projekt suchen wir eine Projektkoordination und studentische Hilfskräfte.
Tania Singer auf der re:publica 2024
Tania Singer spricht auf der re:publica 2024 über die Effekte des mentalen Dyadentrainings und warum es wichtig ist, dieses Training in breite Arme der Gesellschaft zu bringen.
Zu zweit gegen Einsamkeit und Depression
Neuste Forschungsergebnisse belegen, dass kontemplative Dyaden soziale Kompetenzen fördern und psychische Probleme reduzieren
Godara, M., Hecht, M., & Singer, T. (2024).
Training-related improvements in mental well-being through reduction in negative interpretation bias: A randomized trial of online socio-emotional dyadic and mindfulness interventions. Journal of Affective Disorders, 354, 662-672.
Silveira, S.; Godara, M.; Faschinger, A.; & Singer, T. (2023).
Reducing alexithymia and increasing interoceptive awareness: A randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness with dyadic socio-emotional app-based practice. Journal of Affective Disorders, 341, pp. 162-169.
Silveira, S. J.; Godara, M.; Singer, T. (2023).
Boosting Empathy and Compassion Through Mindfulness-Based and Socioemotional Dyadic Practice: Randomized Controlled Trial With App-Delivered Trainings. Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Singer, T.; Engert, V. (2019).
It matters what you practice: Differential training effects on subjective experience, behavior, brain and body in the ReSource Project. Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, pp. 151 – 158